Paper detail

Predictable patterns of CTL escape and reversion across host populations and viral subtypes in HIV-1 evolution

The twin processes of viral evolutionary escape and reversion in response to host immune pressure, in particular the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) response, shape Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 sequence evolution in infected host populations. The tempo of CTL escape and reversion is known to differ between CTL escape variants in a given host population. Here, we ask: are rates of escape and reversion comparable across infected host populations? For three cohorts taken from three continents, we estimate escape and reversion rates at 23 escape sites in optimally defined Gag epitopes. We find consistent escape rate estimates across the examined cohorts. Reversion rates are also consistent between a Canadian and South African infected host population. Certain Gag escape variants that incur a large replicative fitness cost are known to revert rapidly upon transmission. However, the relationship between escape/reversion rates and viral replicative capacity across a large number of epitopes has not been interrogated. We investigate this relationship by examining $in$ $vitro$ replicative capacities of viral sequences with minimal variation: point escape mutants induced in a lab strain. Remarkably, despite the complexities of epistatic effects exemplified by pathways to escape in famous epitopes, and the diversity of both hosts and viruses, CTL escape mutants which escape rapidly tend to be those with the highest replicative capacity when applied as a single point mutation. Similarly, mutants inducing the greatest costs to viral replicative capacity tend to revert more quickly. These data suggest that escape rates in Gag are consistent across host populations, and that in general these rates are dominated by site specific effects upon viral replicative capacity.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.