Paper detail

Precursor outbursts and superoutbursts in the SU UMa-type dwarf nova NN Camelopardalis

We report photometry of three outbursts of NN Cam in 2007, 2008 and 2009. The 2007 event started with a normal outburst, lasting about 4 days, which was a precursor to a superoutburst lasting at least 13 days. Both the precursor and the superoutburst had an amplitude of 4.9 mag above mean quiescence. Superhumps with a maximum peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.22 mag were detected during the superoutburst with a mean superhump period Psh = 0.07385(56) d. Psh decreased continuously with dPsh /dt = -1.72(23) x 10-3. We used our measurement to confirm that the shorter of two possible values of Porb reported by another researcher is the correct one, Porb = 0.0717 d. The 2008 outburst was rather poorly observed, although we present evidence that this too may have been a superoutburst. The 2009 event was also a superoutburst, with Psh = 0.07414(44) d, but we could find no evidence for a precursor. From the 2007 and 2009 data, we report a superhump period excess of epsilon = 0.030(8) to 0.034(6), which is typical for SU UMa dwarf novae of similar orbital period, and estimate the binary mass ratio q = Mwd/Msec $\simeq$ 0.11 to 0.17

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.