Paper detail

Preconditioning FEM discretisations of the high-frequency Helmholtz and Maxwell equations by either perturbing the coefficients or adding absorption

This paper investigates the following question: given a Galerkin matrix corresponding to a finite-element discretisation of either the Helmholtz or time-harmonic Maxwell equations with variable coefficients, suppose that the coefficients of the underlying PDE are perturbed; how good an approximate inverse (i.e., preconditioner) is the resulting Galerkin matrix to the original Galerkin matrix? An important special case is when the perturbation consists of adding absorption (in the spirit of "shifted Laplacian preconditioning"). The results of this paper improve the Helmholtz results in [Gander, Graham, Spence, 2015] and [Graham, Pembery, Spence, 2021], and extend these results to the time-harmonic Maxwell equations, confirming a conjecture in the recent preprint [Li, Hu, arXiv 2501.18305].

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.