Paper detail

Precision study of $W^-W^+H$ production including parton shower effects at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

The precision study of $W^-W^+H$ production with subsequent $W^{\pm} \rightarrow l^{\pm} \overset{ _{(-)}}{ν_{l}}$ and $H \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ decays at the LHC can help us to study the Higgs gauge couplings and to search for new physics beyond the SM. In this paper, we calculate the shower-matched NLO QCD correction and the EW corrections from the $q\bar{q}$ annihilation and photon-induced channels to the $W^-W^+H$ production at the $14~ {\rm TeV}$ LHC, and deal with the subsequent decays of Higgs and $W^{\pm}$ bosons by adopting the {\sc MadSpin} method. Both the integrated cross section and some kinematic distributions of $W^{\pm}$, $H$ and their decay products are provided. We find that the QCD correction enhances the LO differential cross section significantly, while the EW correction from the $q\bar{q}$ annihilation channel obviously suppresses the LO differential cross section, especially in the high energy phase-space region due to the Sudakov effect. The $qγ$- and $γγ$-induced relative corrections are positive, and insensitive to the transverse momenta of $W^{\pm}$, $H$ and their decay products. These photon-induced corrections compensate the negative $q\bar{q}$-initiated EW correction, and become the dominant EW contribution as the increment of the $pp$ colliding energy. The parton shower (PS) effects on the kinematic distributions are nonnegligible. The PS relative correction to the $b$-jet transverse momentum distribution can exceed $100\%$ in the high $p_{T, b}$ region. We also investigate the scale and PDF uncertainties, and find that the theoretical error of the ${\rm QCD}+{\rm EW}+qγ+γγ$ corrected integrated cross section mainly comes from the renormalization scale dependence of the QCD correction.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.