Paper detail

Precision Requirements for Monte Carlo Sums within Hierarchical Bayesian Inference

Hierarchical Bayesian inference is often conducted with estimates of the target distribution derived from Monte Carlo sums over samples from separate analyses of parts of the hierarchy or from mock observations used to estimate sensitivity to a target population. We investigate requirements on the number of Monte Carlo samples needed to guarantee the estimator of the target distribution is precise enough that it does not affect the inference. We consider probabilistic models of how Monte Carlo samples are generated, showing that the finite number of samples introduces additional uncertainty as they act as an imperfect encoding of the components of the hierarchical likelihood. Additionally, we investigate the behavior of estimators marginalized over approximate measures of the uncertainty, comparing their performance to the Monte Carlo point estimate. We find that correlations between the estimators at nearby points in parameter space are crucial to the precision of the estimate. Approximate marginalization that neglects these correlations will either introduce a bias within the inference or be more expensive (require more Monte Carlo samples) than an inference constructed with point estimates. We therefore recommend that hierarchical inferences with empirically estimated target distributions use point estimates.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.