Paper detail

Precision determination of weak charge of $^{133}$Cs from atomic parity violation

We discuss results of the most accurate to-date test of the low-energy electroweak sector of the standard model of elementary particles. Combining previous measurements with our high-precision calculations we extracted the weak charge of the 133Cs nucleus, Q_W = -73.16(29)_exp (20)_th [S.G. Porsev, K. Beloy, and A. Derevianko, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 102}, 181601 (2009)]. The result is in perfect agreement with Q_W^{SM} predicted by the standard model, Q_W^{SM} =-73.16(3), and confirms energy-dependence (or running) of the electroweak interaction and places constraints on a variety of new physics scenarios beyond the standard model. In particular, we increase the lower limit on the masses of extra Z-bosons predicted by models of grand unification and string theories. This paper provides additional details to the Letter. We discuss large-scale calculations in the framework of the coupled-cluster method, including full treatment of single, double, and valence triple excitations. To determine the accuracy of the calculations we computed energies, electric-dipole amplitudes, and hyperfine-structure constants. An extensive comparison with high-accuracy experimental data was carried out.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.