Paper detail

Precision determination of $α_s$ and $m_b$ from QCD sum rules for $b \overline b$.

The QCD sum rules for moments of production cross section of $b \overline b$ states in $e^+\,e^-$ annihilation are extremely sensitive to the values of $m_b$ and $α_s$ for moments of large order $n$. This enables one to extract from the existing data on $Υ$ resonances the values of these parameters with a high precision by using a non-relativistic expansion in $1/n$. It is found that the sum rules fit the data with $α_s^{\overline {MS}} (1 \, GeV) = 0.336 \pm 0.011$ and $m_b=4827 \pm 7 MeV$, where the estimate of the errors includes the theoretical uncertainty due to subleading in $1/n$ terms and the experimental uncertainty of the $e^+\,e^-$ annihilation cross section above the $B \overline B$ threshold. The found value of $α_s$, when evolved in two loops up to the $Z$ mass, gives $α_s^{\overline {MS}} (M_Z) = 0.109 \pm 0.001$. The $b$ quark mass $m_b$ corresponds to the `on shell' value appropriate for one-loop perturbative calculations.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.