Paper detail

Precision and consistency of astrocombs

Astrocombs are ideal spectrograph calibrators whose limiting precision can be derived using a second, independent, astrocomb system. We therefore analyse data from two astrocombs (one 18 GHz and one 25 GHz) used simultaneously on the HARPS spectrograph at the European Southern Observatory. The first aim of this paper is to quantify the wavelength repeatability achieved by a particular astrocomb. The second aim is to measure wavelength calibration consistency between independent astrocombs, that is to place limits or measure any possible zero-point offsets. We present three main findings, each with important implications for exoplanet detection, varying fundamental constant and redshift drift measurements. Firstly, wavelength calibration procedures are important: using multiple segmented polynomials within one echelle order results in significantly better wavelength calibration compared to using a single higher-order polynomial. Segmented polynomials should be used in all applications aimed at precise spectral line position measurements. Secondly, we found that changing astrocombs causes significant zero-point offsets ($\approx 60{\rm cms}^{-1}$ in our raw data) which were removed. Thirdly, astrocombs achieve a precision of $\lesssim 4{\rm cms}^{-1}$ in a single exposure ($\approx 10\% $ above the measured photon-limited precision) and $1 {\rm cms}^{-1}$ when time-averaged over a few hours, confirming previous results. Astrocombs therefore provide the technological requirements necessary for detecting Earth-Sun analogues, measuring variations of fundamental constants and the redshift drift.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.