Paper detail

Precise radial velocities of giant stars VI. A possible 2:1 resonant planet pair around the K giant star $η$ Cet

We report the discovery of a new planetary system around the K giant $η$ Cet (HIP 5364, HD 6805) based on 118 high-precision optical radial velocities taken at Lick Observatory since July 2000. Since October 2011 an additional nine near-infrared Doppler measurements have been taken using the ESO CRIRES spectrograph (VLT, UT1). The visible data set shows two clear periodicities. Although we cannot completely rule out that the shorter period is due to rotational modulation of stellar features, the infrared data show the same variations as in the optical, which strongly supports that the variations are caused by two planets. Assuming the mass of $η$ Cet to be 1.7 $M_\odot$, the best edge-on coplanar dynamical fit to the data is consistent with two massive planets ($m_b\sin i$ = 2.6 $\pm$ 0.2 $M_{\mathrm{Jup}}$, $m_c\sin i$ = 3.3 $\pm$ 0.2 $M_{\mathrm{Jup}}$), with periods of $P_b$ = 407 $\pm$ 3 days and $P_c$ = 740 $\pm$ 5 days and eccentricities of $e_b$ = 0.12 $\pm$ 0.05 and $e_c$ = 0.08 $\pm$ 0.03. We tested a wide variety of edge-on coplanar and inclined planetary configurations for stability, which agree with the derived radial velocities. We find that in certain coplanar orbital configurations with moderate $e_b$ eccentricity, the planets can be effectively trapped in an anti-aligned 2:1 mean motion resonance. A much larger non-resonant stable region exists in low-eccentricity parameter space, although it appears to be much farther from the best fit than the 2:1 resonant region. In all other cases, the system is categorized as unstable or chaotic. Another conclusion from the coplanar inclined dynamical test is that the planets can be at most a factor of $\sim$ 1.4 more massive than their suggested minimum masses. This stability constraint on the inclination excludes the possibility of two brown dwarfs, and strongly favors a planetary system.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.