Paper detail

Precise Matching of PL Curves in $R^N$ in the Square Root Velocity Framework

The square root velocity function (SRVF), introduced by Srivastava et al, has proved to be an effective way to compare absolutely continuous curves in $R^N$ modulo reparametrization. Several computational papers have been published based on this method. In this paper, we carefully establish the theoretical foundations of the SRVF method. In particular, we analyze the quotient construction of the set of absolutely continuous curves modulo the group (or in some cases, semigroup) of reparametrizations, proving an important theorem about the structure of the closed orbits required in this quotient construction. We observe that the set of piecewise linear curves is dense in the space of absolutely continuous curves with respect to the SRVF metric. Finally, given two piecewise linear curves, we establish a precise algorithm for producing the optimal matching between these curves. This also results in a precise determination of the geodesic between the points in the quotient space corresponding to these curves. In the past, this geodesic has only been approximated using the method of Dynamic Programming. We show examples resulting from this algorithm.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.