Paper detail

Precise Expression for the Algorithmic Information Distance

We consider the notion of information distance between two objects $x$ and $y$ introduced by Bennett, Gács, Li, Vitányi, and Zurek in 1998 as the minimal length of a program that computes $x$ from $y$ as well as computing $y$ from $x$. In this paper, it was proven that the distance is equal to $\max (K(x|y),K(y|x))$ up to additive logarithmic terms, and it was conjectured that this could not be improved to $O(1)$ precision. We revisit subtle issues in the definition and prove this conjecture. We show that if the distance is at least logarithmic in the length, then this equality does hold with $O(1)$ precision for strings of equal length. Thus for such strings, both the triangle inequality and the characterization hold with optimal precision. Finally, we extend the result to sets $S$ of bounded size. We show that for each constant~$s$, the shortest program that prints an $s$-element set $S \subseteq \{0,1\}^n$ given any of its elements, has length at most $\max_{w \in S} K(S|w) + O(1)$, provided this maximum is at least logarithmic in~$n$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.