Paper detail

Precise Estimates of the Higgs Mass in Heavy SUSY

In supersymmetric models, very heavy stop squarks introduce large logarithms into the computation of the Higgs boson mass. Although it has long been known that in simple cases these logs can be resummed using effective field theory techniques, it is technically easier to use fixed-order formulas, and many public codes implement the latter. We calculate three- and four-loop next-to-next-to-leading-log corrections to the Higgs mass and compare the fixed order formulas numerically to the resummation results in order to estimate the range of supersymmetry scales where the fixed-order results are reliable. We find that the four-loop result may be accurate up to a few tens of TeV. We confirm an accidental cancellation between different three-loop terms, first observed in S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 75, 055005 (2007), and show that it persists to higher scales and becomes more effective with the inclusion of higher radiative corrections. Existing partial three-loop calculations that include only one of the two cancelling terms may overestimate the Higgs mass. We give analytic expressions for the three- and four-loop corrections in terms of Standard Model parameters and provide a complete dictionary for translating parameters between the SM and the MSSM and the $\MSbar$ and $\DRbar$ renormalization schemes.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.