Paper detail

Precipitable Water Vapor: Considerations on the water vapor scale height, dry bias of the radiosonde humidity sensors, and spatial and temporal variability of the humidity field

The Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) and the European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT) site testing teams have recently finalized their site testing studies. Since atmospheric water vapor is the dominant source of absorption and increased thermal background in the infrared, both projects included precipitable water vapor (PWV) measurements in their corresponding site testing campaigns. TMT planned to monitor PWV at the sites of interest by means of using infrared radiometers. Technical failures and calibration issues prevented them from having a sufficiently long PWV time-series to characterize the sites using this method. Therefore, for the sites in Chile TMT used surface water vapor density measurements, which taken together with an assumed water vapor scale height, allowed for the estimation of PWV. On the other hand, the E-ELT team conducted dedicated PWV measurement campaigns at two of their observatory sites using radiosonde soundings to validate historical time-series of PWV reconstructed by way of a spectroscopic analysis of astronomical standard sources observed at the La Silla and the Paranal sites. The E-ELT also estimated the median PWV for the Armazones site from extrapolation of their Paranal statistics accounting for the difference in elevation between the two places; and also from archival analysis of radiosonde data available from the city of Antofagasta by integration of the humidity profile starting from 3000 m altitude. In the case of the Armazones site, the published median of PWV by both groups differ by about 1 mm with the E-ELT values being drier than those estimated by the TMT group. This work looks at some of the reasons that could explain this difference, among them the water vapor scale height, the horizontal variability of the water vapor field, and an unaccounted correction due to a dry bias known to affect the radiosondes relative humidity sensors.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.