Paper detail

Pre-unstable set of multiple transient three-dimensional perturbation waves and the associated turbulent state in a shear flow

In order to understand whether, and to what extent, spectral representation can effectively highlight the nonlinear interaction among different scales, it is necessary to consider the state that precedes the onset of instabilities and turbulence in flows. In this condition, a system is still stable, but is however subject to a swarming of arbitrary 3D small perturbations. These can arrive any instant, and then undergo a transient evolution which is ruled out by the initial-value problem associated to the Navier-Stokes linearized formulation. The set of 3D small perturbations constitutes a system of multiple spatial and temporal scales which are subject to all the processes included in the perturbative Navier-Stokes equations: linearized convective transport, linearized vortical stretching and tilting, and the molecular diffusion. Leaving aside nonlinear interaction among the different scales, these features are tantamount to the features of the turbulent state. We determine the exponent of the inertial range of arbitrary longitudinal and transversal perturbations acting on a typical shear flow, i.e. the bluff-body wake. Then, we compare the present results with the exponent of the corresponding developed turbulent state (notoriously equal to -5/3). For longitudinal perturbations, we observe a decay rate of -3 in the inertial range, typically met in two-dimensional turbulence. For purely 3D perturbations, instead, the energy decreases with a factor of -5/3. If we consider a combination of longitudinal and transversal perturbative waves, the energy spectrum seems to have a decay of -3 for larger wavenumbers ([50, 100]), while for smaller wavenumbers ([3,50]) the decay is of the order -5/3. We can conclude that the value of the exponent of the inertial range has a much higher level of universality, which is not necessarily associated to the nonlinear interaction.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.