Paper detail

Pre-outburst $Chandra$ Observations of the Recurrent Nova T Pyxidis

I present a total of 98.8 ksec ($\sim$ 3$\times$30 ksec) observation of T Pyx with the ACIS-S3 detector on-board the $Chandra$ Observatory obtained during the quiescent phase, about 2-3 months before its outburst in April 2011. The total $Chandra$ spectrum of the source T Pyx gives a maximum temperature kT$_{max}$$>$ 37.0 keV with (0.9-1.5)$\times 10^{-13}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ and (1.3-2.2)$\times$10$^{32}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (at 3.5 kpc) in the 0.1-50 keV range using a multi-temperature plasma emission model (i.e., CEVMKL in XSPEC). I find a ratio of (L$_{x}$/L$_{disk}$)$\simeq$(2-7)$\times$10$^{-4}$ indicating considerable inefficiency of emission in the boundary layer. There is no blackbody emission with 2$σ$ upper limits kT$_{BB}$$<$ 25 eV and L$_{soft}$$<$ 2.0$\times$10$^{33}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in the 0.1-10.0 keV band. All fits yield only interstellar N${\rm _H}$ during quiescence. I suggest that T Pyx has an optically thin boundary layer (BL) merged with an ADAF-like flow (Advection-Dominated Flow) and/or X-ray corona in the inner disk indicating ongoing quasi-spherical accretion at (very) high rates during quiescent phases. Such a BL structure may be excessively heating the WD, influencing the thermonuclear runaway leading to the recurrent nova events. The central source (i.e., the binary system) emission and its spectrum is deconvolved with a detailed procedure at the sub-pixel level revealing an extended emission with S/N $\sim$6-10. The derived shape looks like an elliptical nebula with a semi-major axis $\sim$1.0 arc sec and a semi-minor axis $\sim$0.5 arc sec. The calculated approximate count rate of the extended emission is 0.0013-0.0025 c s$^{-1}$. The luminosity of the nebula is $\sim$(0.6-30.0)$\times$10$^{31}$ erg s$^{-1}$. The nebulosity seems consistent with an interaction of the outflow/ejecta from the 1966 outburst.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.