Paper detail

Practical Secrecy: Bridging the Gap between Cryptography and Physical Layer Security

Current security techniques can be implemented either by requiring a secret key exchange or depending on assumptions about the communication channels. In this paper, we show that, by using a physical layer technique known as artificial noise, it is feasible to protect secret data without any form of secret key exchange and any restriction on the communication channels. Specifically, we analyze how the artificial noise can achieve practical secrecy. By treating the artificial noise as an unshared one-time pad secret key, we show that the proposed scheme also achieves Shannon's perfect secrecy. Moreover, we show that achieving perfect secrecy is much easier than ensuring non-zero secrecy capacity, especially when the eavesdropper has more antennas than the transmitter. Focusing on the practical applications, we show that practical secrecy and strong secrecy can be guaranteed even if the eavesdropper attempts to remove the artificial noise. We finally show the connections between traditional cryptography and physical layer security.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.