Paper detail

Practical pretenders

Following Srinivasan, an integer n\geq 1 is called practical if every natural number in [1,n] can be written as a sum of distinct divisors of n. This motivates us to define f(n) as the largest integer with the property that all of 1, 2, 3,..., f(n) can be written as a sum of distinct divisors of n. (Thus, n is practical precisely when f(n)\geq n.) We think of f(n) as measuring the "practicality" of n; large values of f correspond to numbers n which we term practical pretenders. Our first theorem describes the distribution of these impostors: Uniformly for 4 \leq y \leq x, #{n\leq x: f(n)\geq y} \asymp \frac{x}{\log{y}}. This generalizes Saias's result that the count of practical numbers in [1,x] is \asymp \frac{x}{\log{x}}. Next, we investigate the maximal order of f when restricted to non-practical inputs. Strengthening a theorem of Hausman and Shapiro, we show that every n > 3 for which f(n) \geq \sqrt{e^γ n\log\log{n}} is a practical number. Finally, we study the range of f. Call a number m belonging to the range of f an additive endpoint. We show that for each fixed A >0 and ε> 0, the number of additive endpoints in [1,x] is eventually smaller than x/(\log{x})^A but larger than x^{1-ε}.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.