Paper detail

Practical implementation and error bounds of integer-type general algorithm for higher order differential equations

In our preceding paper, we have proposed an algorithm for obtaining finite-norm solutions of higher-order linear ordinary differential equations of the Fuchsian type [\sum_m p_m (x) (d/dx)^m] f(x) = 0 (where p_m is a polynomial with rational-number-valued coefficients), by using only the four arithmetical operations on integers, and we proved its validity. For any nonnegative integer k, it is guaranteed mathematically that this method can produce all the solutions satisfying \int |f(x)|^2 (x^2+1)^k dx < \infty, under some conditions. We materialize this algorithm in practical procedures. An interger-type quasi-orthogonalization used there can suppress the explosion of calculations. Moreover, we give an upper limit of the errors. We also give some results of numerical experiments and compare them with the corresponding exact analytical solutions, which show that the proposed algorithm is successful in yielding solutions with high accuracy (using only arithmetical operations on integers).

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.