Paper detail

Practical Idiomatic Considerations for Checkable Meta-Logic in Experimental Functional Programming

Implementing a complex concept as an executable model in a strongly typed, purely functional language hits a sweet spot between mere simulation and formal specification. For research and education it is often desirable to enrich the algorithmic code with meta-logical annotations, variously embodied as assertions, theorems or test cases. Checking frameworks use the inherent logical power of the functional paradigm to approximate theorem proving by heuristic testing. Here we propose several novel idioms to enhance the practical expressivity of checking, namely meta-language marking, nominal axiomatics, and constructive existentials. All of these are formulated in literate Haskell'98 with some common language extensions. Their use and impact are illustrated by application to a realistic modeling problem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.