Paper detail

Powering Stellar Magnetism: Energy Transfers in Cyclic Dynamos of Sun-like Stars

We use the ASH code to model the convective dynamo of solar-type stars. Based on a series of 15 3-D MHD simulations spanning 4 bins in rotation and mass, we show what mechanisms are at work in these stellar dynamos with and without magnetic cycles and how global stellar parameters affect the outcome. We also derive scaling laws for the differential rotation and magnetic field based on these simulations. We find a weaker trend between differential rotation and stellar rotation rate, ($ΔΩ\sim (|Ω|/Ω_{\odot})^{0.46}$) in the MHD solutions than in their HD counterpart $(|Ω|/Ω_{\odot})^{0.66})$, yielding a better agreement with the observational trends based on power laws. We find that for a fluid Rossby number between $0.15 \lesssim Ro_f \lesssim 0.65$ the solutions possess long magnetic cycle, if $Ro_f \lesssim 0.42$ a short cycle and if $Ro_f \gtrsim 1$ (anti-solar-like differential rotation) a statistically steady state. We show that short-cycle dynamos follow the classical Parker-Yoshimura rule whereas the long-cycle period ones do not. We further demonstrate that the Rossby number dependency of the large-scale surface magnetic field in the simulation ($B_{L,surf} \sim Ro_{f}^{-1.26}$) agrees better with observations ($B_{V} \sim Ro_{s}^{-1.4 \pm 0.1}$) and differs from dynamo scaling based on the global magnetic energy ($B_{bulk} \sim Ro_{f}^{-0.5}$). We also show that up to few percents of the stellar luminosity can be channelled into the star's magnetism, hence providing a large energy reservoir for possible surface eruptive events.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.