Paper detail

Power-to-Gas in a gas and electricity distribution network: a sensitivity analysis of modeling approaches

Power-to-Gas (P2G) has been one of the most frequently discussed technologies in the last few years. This technology allows producing CO2 free fuels. Thanks to its high flexibility, it may offer services to the power system, fostering Variable Renewable Energy Sources (VRES) and the electricity demand match, mitigating the issues related to VRES overproduction. The role of P2G plants connected to the transmission system as flexibility asset has been extensively analyzed in the literature. Conversely, the analysis of these systems used at distribution level has only been dealt with in a few studies: however, in this case critical operation conditions can easily arise, both on electrical and gas infrastructure. This article presents a methodological analysis on the impact of different simulation approaches when P2G is installed at distribution system level. The choice of the most appropriate modeling approaches for electricity and distribution grids is required in order to avoid overestimating or underestimating the potential flexibility that P2G plants connected to distribution networks can offer. The aim of this paper is to understand the impact of different modeling approaches in order to determine whether, and under which conditions, this is acceptable. An illustrative case study has been developed to perform this kind of analysis. The results demonstrated that it is important to take into account the electric distribution network topology, as the performance of P2G plants could be affected by their placement in the network. Neglecting the dynamics of a gas network or the interactions between P2G plant components under a low gas demand condition can lead to an underestimation of the flexibility of the entire system. If the demand for gas is high enough, the use of simplified assumptions that do not consider the dynamics of the gas network and P2G systems may be acceptable.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.