Paper detail

Power Spectrum Analysis of the Stromlo-APM Redshift Survey

We test estimators of the galaxy power spectrum $P(k)$ against simulated galaxy catalogues constructed from N-body simulations and we derive formulae to correct for biases. These estimators are then applied to compute the power spectrum of galaxies in the Stromlo-APM redshift survey. We test whether the amplitude of $P(k)$ depends on galaxy luminosity, but find no significant luminosity dependence except at absolute magnitudes brighter than $M_{\bj} = -20.3$, ($H_{0} = 100 \kms$) where there is some evidence for a rise in the amplitude of $P(k)$. By comparing the redshift space power spectrum of the Stromlo-APM survey with the real space power spectrum determined from the parent APM Galaxy Survey, we attempt to measure the distortion in the shape of $P(k)$ caused by galaxy peculiar motions. We find some evidence for an effect, but the errors are large and do not exclude a value of $β= Ω^{0.6}/b = 1$, where $Ω$ is the cosmological density parameter and $b$ is the linear biasing parameter relating galaxy fluctuations to those in the mass, $\left(δρ/ρ\right)_{gal} = b \left(δρ/ρ\right)_{m}$. The shape of the Stromlo-APM power spectrum is consistent with that determined from the CfA-2 survey, but has a slightly higher amplitude by a factor of about 1.4 than the power spectrum of IRAS galaxies.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.