Paper detail

Power of the redshift drift on cosmological models and expansion history

We investigate the power of the velocity drift ($Δv$) on cosmological parameters and expansion history with observational Hubble data (OHD), type Ia supernova (SNIa). We estimate the constraints of $Δv$ using the Fisher information matrix based on the model by \citet{pasquini2005codex,whitelock2006scientific}. We find that $Δv$ with 20 years can reduce the uncertainty of $Ω_m$ by more than 42% than available observations. Based on the statistical figures of merit (FoM), we find that in order to match the constraint power of OHD and SNIa, we need 21 and 26 future measurements, respectively. We also quantitatively estimate for the first time the number of years required for the velocity drift to become comparable with current observations on the equation of state $w$. The statistical FoM indicate that we need at least 12 years to cover current observations. Physically, we could monitor 30 quasars for 30 years to obtain the same accuracy of $w$. Considering two parameterized deceleration factor $q(z)$, we find that the available observations give an estimation on current value $-0.9 \lesssim q_0 \lesssim -0.3$. Difference between the two types of $q(z)$ is the precise determination of variation rate $dq/dz$. For the first model with constant $dq/dz$, $Δv$ with only 10 years provides a much better constraint on it, especially when compared with SNIa. However, we need $Δv$ for more years in the variable $dq/dz$ model. We find that $Δv$ with 30 years reduces the uncertainty of transition redshift to approximately three times better than those of OHD and SNIa.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.