Paper detail

Power of Nondetreministic JAGs on Cayley graphs

The Immerman-Szelepcsenyi Theorem uses an algorithm for co-st- connectivity based on inductive counting to prove that NLOGSPACE is closed un- der complementation. We want to investigate whether counting is necessary for this theorem to hold. Concretely, we show that Nondeterministic Jumping Graph Autmata (ND-JAGs) (pebble automata on graphs), on several families of Cayley graphs, are equal in power to nondeterministic logspace Turing machines that are given such graphs as a linear encoding. In particular, it follows that ND-JAGs can solve co-st-connectivity on those graphs. This came as a surprise since Cook and Rackoff showed that deterministic JAGs cannot solve st-connectivity on many Cayley graphs due to their high self-similarity (every neighbourhood looks the same). Thus, our results show that on these graphs, nondeterminism provably adds computational power. The families of Cayley graphs we consider include Cayley graphs of abelian groups and of all finite simple groups irrespective of how they are presented and graphs corresponding to groups generated by various product constructions, in- cluding iterated ones. We remark that assessing the precise power of nondeterministic JAGs and in par- ticular whether they can solve co-st-connectivity on arbitrary graphs is left as an open problem by Edmonds, Poon and Achlioptas. Our results suggest a positive answer to this question and in particular considerably limit the search space for a potential counterexample.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.