Paper detail

Power Module Heat Sink Design Optimization with Ensembles of Data-Driven Polynomial Chaos Surrogate Models

We consider the problem of optimizing the design of a heat sink used for cooling an insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) power module. The thermal behavior of the heat sink is originally estimated using a high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation, which renders numerical optimization too computationally demanding. To enable optimization studies, we substitute the CFD simulation model with an inexpensive polynomial surrogate model that approximates the relation between the device's design features and a relevant thermal quantity of interest. The surrogate model of choice is a data-driven polynomial chaos expansion (DD-PCE), which learns the aforementioned relation by means of polynomial regression. Advantages of the DD-PCE include its applicability in small-data regimes and its easily adaptable model structure. To address the issue of model-form uncertainty and model robustness in view of limited training and test data, ensembles of DD-PCEs are generated based on data re-shuffling. Then, using the full ensemble of surrogate models, the surrogate-based predictions are accompanied by uncertainty metrics such as mean value and variance. Once trained and tested in terms of accuracy and robustness, the ensemble of DD-PCE surrogates replaces the high-fidelity simulation model in optimization algorithms aiming to identify heat sink designs that optimize the thermal behavior of the IGBT under geometrical and operational constraints. Optimized heat sink designs are obtained for a computational cost much smaller than utilizing the original model in the optimization procedure. Due to ensemble modeling, the optimization results can also be assessed in terms of uncertainty and robustness. Comparisons against alternative surrogate modeling techniques illustrate why the DD-PCE should be preferred in the considered setting.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.