Paper detail

Power Hardware-In-the-Loop Testing of a Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Framework

This paper demonstrates the value of power hardware-in-the-loop (PHIL) testing for the study of peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading. P2P has emerged as a promising candidate for coordinating large numbers of distributed energy resources (DER) that pose a risk to network operations if left unmanaged. The existing literature has so far relied on pure software simulations to study DER and distribution networks within this context. This requires the development of simplified models for complex components due to the computational limitations involved. Issues that arise through the operation of physical hardware in real-world applications are therefore neglected. We present PHIL testing as a solution to this problem by exhibiting its ability to capture the complex behaviors of physical DER devices. A high-fidelity PHIL test environment is introduced that combines key hardware elements with a simulated network model to study a P2P trading scenario. The initial findings reveal several underlying challenges of coordinating DER that are not typically discussed in prior works.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.