Paper detail

Power correlations in cosmology: limits on primordial non-Gaussian density fields

We probe the statistical nature of the primordial density field by measuring correlations between the power in adjacent Fourier modes. For certain types of non-Gaussian field, these k-space correlations would be expected to be more extended than for a Gaussian field, providing a useful discriminatory test for Gaussian fields. We apply this test to the combined QDOT and 1.2-Jy IRAS galaxy survey and find the observed density field to be in good agreement with having Gaussian density fluctuations for modes with k < 0.1 h/Mpc. From this result we are able to set quantitative limits on a class of possible non-Gaussian distributions -- the product of a Gaussian field with an independent stochastic field. The maximum sensitivity is to modulations of a Gaussian field with coherence scales of 30 Mpc/h and the rms modulation on this scale cannot greatly exceed unity. We discuss the improvements to this limit likely to be set by future surveys.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.