Paper detail

Power Control for Packet Streaming with Head-of-Line Deadlines

We consider a mathematical model for streaming media packets (as the motivating key example) from a transmitter buffer to a receiver over a wireless link while controlling the transmitter power (hence, the packet/job processing rate). When each packet comes to the head-of-line (HOL) in the buffer, it is given a deadline $D$ which is the maximum number of times the transmitter can attempt retransmission in order to successfully transmit the packet. If this number of transmission attempts is exhausted, the packet is ejected from the buffer and the next packet comes to the HOL. Costs are incurred in each time slot for holding packets in the buffer, expending transmitter power, and ejecting packets which exceed their deadlines. We investigate how transmission power should be chosen so as to minimize the total cost of transmitting the items in the buffer. We formulate the optimal power control problem in a dynamic programming framework and then hone in on the special case of fixed interference. For this special case, we are able to provide a precise analytic characterization of how the power control should vary with the backlog and how the power control should react to approaching deadlines. In particular, we show monotonicity results for how the transmitter should adapt power levels to the backlog and approaching deadlines. We leverage these analytic results from the special case to build a power control scheme for the general case. Monte Carlo simulations are used to evaluate the performance of the resulting power control scheme as compared to the optimal scheme. The resulting power control scheme is sub-optimal but it provides a low-complexity approximation of the optimal power control. Simulations show that our proposed schemes outperform benchmark algorithms. We also discuss applications of the model to other practical operational scenarios.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.