Paper detail

Power and spatial complexity in stochastic reconnection

The level of spatial complexity associated with a given vector field on an arbitrary range of scales \iffalse ${\bf F(x}, t)$ can be quantified by a simple, time-dependent function $S(t)={1\over 2}(1-\hat{\bf F}_l.\hat{\bf F}_L)_{rms}$ with ${\bf F}_l$ (${\bf F}_L$) being the average field in a volume of scale $l$ ($L>l$) and the unit vector defined as $\hat{\bf F}={\bf F}/|{\bf F}|$. Thus,\fi can be quantified by a simple, scale-dependent function of time; $0\leq S(t)\leq 1$. Previous work has invoked kinetic and magnetic complexities, associated with velocity and magnetic fields ${\bf u(x}, t)$ and ${\bf B(x}, t)$, to study magnetic reconnection and diffusion in turbulent and magnetized fluids. In this paper, using the coarse-grained momentum equation, we argue that the fluid jets associated with magnetic reconnection events at an arbitrary scale $l$ in the turbulence inertial range are predominantly driven by the Lorentz force ${\bf{N}}_l=({\bf j\times B})_l-{\bf j}_l\times {\bf B}_l$. This force, is induced by the subscale currents and is analogous to the turbulent electromotive force ${\cal E}_l=({\bf u\times B})_l-{\bf u}_l\times {\bf B}_l$ in dynamo theories. Typically, high (low) magnetic complexities during reconnection imply large (small) spatial gradients for the magnetic field, i.e., strong (weak) Lorentz forces ${\bf N}_l$. Reconnection launches jets of fluid, hence the rate of change of kinetic complexity is expected to strongly correlate with the power injected by the Lorentz force ${\bf N}_l$. We test this prediction using an incompressible, homogeneous magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation and associate it with previous results. It follows that the stronger (weaker) the turbulence, the more (less) complex the magnetic field and the stronger (weaker) the reconnection field and thus the ensuing reconnection.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.