Paper detail

Powder Lot Variations: A Case Study with Varget - Hodgdon Extreme

Small arms propellant distributor Hodgdon claims that rifle powders in its Extreme line have small velocity variations with both temperature changes and lot number. This paper reports on the variations in average velocity of four different lots of Hodgdon Extreme Varget tested in two .223 Remington loads. Compared to the lot with the slowest average velocity, the other three lots of powder had higher average velocities ranging from 23.4 ft/s faster up to 45.6 ft/s faster with a 69 grain Nosler Custom Competition bullet and from 7.9 ft/s faster to 15.3 ft/s with the 53 grain Hornady VMAX. The mean velocity differences between lots are slightly correlated between the two loads with a correlation coefficient of 0.54. This correlation suggests that factors other than lot to lot variations contribute significantly to the measured velocity variations. Unlike the much larger lot to lot variations that were reported previously for H4831, lot to lot variations in velocity for Varget seem consistent with Hodgdon's marketing claims.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.