Paper detail

Potential of deep features for opinion-unaware, distortion-unaware, no-reference image quality assessment

Image Quality Assessment algorithms predict a quality score for a pristine or distorted input image, such that it correlates with human opinion. Traditional methods required a non-distorted "reference" version of the input image to compare with, in order to predict this score. However, recent "No-reference" methods circumvent this requirement by modelling the distribution of clean image features, thereby making them more suitable for practical use. However, majority of such methods either use hand-crafted features or require training on human opinion scores (supervised learning), which are difficult to obtain and standardise. We explore the possibility of using deep features instead, particularly, the encoded (bottleneck) feature maps of a Convolutional Autoencoder neural network architecture. Also, we do not train the network on subjective scores (unsupervised learning). The primary requirements for an IQA method are monotonic increase in predicted scores with increasing degree of input image distortion, and consistent ranking of images with the same distortion type and content, but different distortion levels. Quantitative experiments using the Pearson, Kendall and Spearman correlation scores on a diverse set of images show that our proposed method meets the above requirements better than the state-of-art method (which uses hand-crafted features) for three types of distortions: blurring, noise and compression artefacts. This demonstrates the potential for future research in this relatively unexplored sub-area within IQA.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.