Paper detail

Potent Tree Codes and their applications: Coding for Interactive Communication, revisited

We study the fundamental problem of reliable interactive communication over a noisy channel. In a breakthrough sequence of papers published in 1992 and 1993, Schulman gave non-constructive proofs of the existence of general methods to emulate any two-party interactive protocol such that: (1) the emulation protocol takes a constant-factor longer than the original protocol, and (2) if the emulation protocol is executed over a noisy channel, then the probability that the emulation protocol fails is exponentially small in the total length of the protocol. Unfortunately, Schulman's emulation procedures either only work in a model with a large amount of shared randomness, or are non-constructive in that they rely on the existence of good tree codes. The only known proofs of the existence of good tree codes are non-constructive, and finding an explicit construction remains an important open problem. Indeed, randomly generated tree codes are not good tree codes with overwhelming probability. In this work, we revisit the problem of reliable interactive communication, and obtain the following results: We introduce a new notion of goodness for a tree code, and define the notion of a potent tree code. We believe that this notion is of independent interest. We prove the correctness of an explicit emulation procedure based on any potent tree code. We show that a randomly generated tree code (with suitable constant alphabet size) is a potent tree code with overwhelming probability. Furthermore we are able to partially derandomize this result using only O(n) random bits, where $n$ is the depth of the tree. These results allow us to obtain the first fully explicit emulation procedure for reliable interactive communication over noisy channels with a constant communication overhead, and exponentially small failure probability.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.