Paper detail

Post-LHC7 fine-tuning in the mSUGRA/CMSSM model with a 125 GeV Higgs boson

The recent discovery of a 125 GeV Higgs-like resonance at LHC, coupled with the lack of evidence for weak scale supersymmetry (SUSY), have severely constrained SUSY models such as mSUGRA/CMSSM. As LHC probes deeper into SUSY model parameter space, the little hierarchy problem -- how to reconcile the Z and Higgs boson mass scale with the scale of SUSY breaking -- will become increasingly exacerbated unless a sparticle signal is found. We evaluate two different measures of fine-tuning in the mSUGRA/CMSSM model. The more stringent of these, Δ_{HS}, includes effects that arise from the high scale origin of the mSUGRA parameters while the second measure, Δ_{EW}, is determined only by weak scale parameters: hence, it is universal to any model with the same particle spectrum and couplings. Our results incorporate the latest constraints from LHC7 sparticle searches, LHCb limits from B_s ->μ^+μ^- and also require a light Higgs scalar with m_h ~123-127 GeV. We present fine-tuning contours in the m_0 vs. m_{1/2} plane for several sets of A_0 and tan(β) values. We also present results for Δ_{HS} and Δ_{EW} from a scan over the entire viable model parameter space. We find a Δ_{HS} > 10^3, or at best 0.1% fine-tuning. For the less stringent electroweak fine tuning, we find Δ_{EW} > 10^2, or at best 1% fine-tuning. Two benchmark points are presented that have the lowest values of Δ_{HS} and Δ_{EW}. Our results provide a quantitative measure for ascertaining whether or not the remaining mSUGRA/CMSSM model parameter space is excessively fine-tuned, and so could provide impetus for considering alternative SUSY models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.