Paper detail

Possible tidal dissipation in millisecond pulsar binaries

The post-Keplerian(PK) parameters inferred from pulsar timing provide a convenient way to test Einstein's general theory of relativity. However, before obtaining a pure orbital decay $\dot{P}_b$ induced by gravitational wave radiation, which is one of the PK parameters, a number of factors need to be accounted for carefully. The effect of tidal dissipation on $\dot{P}_b$ has been thought of as negligible. Here, we investigate the data for possible effects of tidal dissipation on $\dot{P}_b$. The possibility of the tidal dissipation as a contributor to $\dot{P}_b$ in a large sample of millisecond pulsar binaries is investigated in detail. We collected a large sample of pulsar binaries with measured $\dot{P}_b$. All of the systems are millisecond pulsars. The residual $\dot{P}^{Res}_b$ of these systems was obtained by subtracting the three normal effects, that is to say the effect of Shklovskii, line-of-sight acceleration, and gravitational radiation. Assuming that tidal dissipation is responsible for such a residual $\dot{P}^{Res}_b$, the tidal parameters of these systems can be calculated and compared with the tidal models. The residual $\dot{P}^{Res}_b$ is distributed over the half positive and half negative. The dynamical tidal model can explain the residual $\dot{P}_b$ of millisecond pulsar-white dwarf binaries. And the Love number of the main-sequence companion of \object{PSR J1227-4853} can be derived as a reasonable value $k_2=0.177^{+0.098}_{-0.058}$ with the equilibrium tidal model. Those results are compatible with the scenario of tidal dissipation. Additionally, a weak correlation between the tidal parameter and orbital period is revealed, likely originating in the tidal process of the recycled stage which is worthy of further investigation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.