Paper detail

Possible Resolution of the Hubble Tension with Weyl Invariant Gravity

We explore cosmological implications of a genuinely Weyl invariant (WI) gravitational interaction. The latter reduces to general relativity in a particular conformal frame for which the gravitational coupling and active gravitational masses are fixed. Specifically, we consider a cosmological model in this framework that is {\it dynamically} identical to the standard model (SM) of cosmology. However, {\it kinematics} of test particles traveling in the new background metric is modified thanks to a new (cosmological) fundamental mass scale, $γ$, of the model. Since the lapse-function of the new metric is radially-dependent any incoming photon experiences (gravitational) red/blueshift in the {\it comoving} frame, unlike in the SM. Distance scales are modified as well due to the scale $γ$. The claimed $4.4σ$ tension level between the locally measured Hubble constant, $H_{0}$, with SH0ES and the corresponding value inferred from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) could then be significantly alleviated by an earlier-than-thought recombination. Assuming vanishing spatial curvature, either one of the Planck 2018 (P18) or dark energy survey (DES) yr1 data sets subject to the SH0ES prior imply that $γ^{-1}$ is $O(100)$ times larger than the Hubble scale, $H_{0}^{-1}$. Considering P18+SH0ES or P18+DES+SH0ES data set combinations, the odds against vanishing $γ$ are over 1000:1 and 2000:1, respectively, and the model is strongly favored over the SM with a deviance information criterion (DIC) gain $\gtrsim 10$ and $\gtrsim 12$, respectively. The tension is reduced in this model to $\sim 1.5$ and $1.3 σ$, respectively. We conclude that the $H_{0}$ tension may simply result from a yet unrecognized fundamental symmetry of the gravitational interaction -- Weyl invariance. (abridged)

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.