Paper detail

Possible relevance of quantum spacetime for neutrino-telescope data analyses

One of the primary goals of neutrino telescopes, such as IceCube, is the discovery of neutrinos emitted by gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Another source of interest in the results obtained by these telescopes is their possible use for tests of the applicability of Einstein's Special Relativity to neutrinos, particularly with respect to modifications that lead to Lorentz invariance violation that have been conjectured by some models of quantum space-time. We examine here the fascinating scenario in which these two aspects of neutrino-telescope physics require a combined analysis. We discuss how neutrinos that one would not associate to a GRB, when assuming a classical spacetime picture, may well be GRB neutrinos if the possibility that Lorentz invariance is broken at very high energies is taken into account. As an illustrative example we examine three IceCube high energy neutrinos that arrived hours before GRBs (but from the same direction) and we find that the available, IceCube data, while inconclusive, is compatible with a scenario in which one or two of these neutrinos were GRB neutrinos and their earlier arrival reflects Lorentz invariance violation. We outline how future analyses of neutrino data should be done in order to systematically test this possibility.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.