Paper detail

Possible Production of Solar Spicules by Microfilament Eruptions

We examine Big Bear Solar Observatory (BBSO) Goode Solar Telescope (GST) high-spatial resolution (0''.06), high-cadence (3.45 s), H-alpha-0.8 Angstrom images of central-disk solar spicules, using data of Samanta et al. (2019). We compare with coronal-jet chromospheric-component observations of Sterling et al. (2010a). Morphologically, bursts of spicules, referred to as "enhanced spicular activities" by Samanta et al. (2019), appear as scaled-down versions of the jet's chromospheric component. Both the jet and the enhanced spicular activities appear as chromospheric-material strands, undergoing twisting-type motions of ~20---50 km/s in the jet and ~20---30 km/s in the enhanced spicular activities. Presumably, the jet resulted from a minifilament-carrying magnetic eruption. For two enhanced spicular activities that we examine in detail, we find tentative candidates for corresponding erupting microfilaments, but not expected corresponding base brightenings. Nonetheless, the enhanced-spicular-activities' interacting mixed-polarity base fields, frequent-apparent-twisting motions, and morphological similarities to the coronal jet's chromospheric-temperature component, suggest that erupting microfilaments might drive the enhanced spicular activities but be hard to detect, perhaps due to H-alpha opacity. Degrading the BBSO/GST-image resolution with a 1''.0-FWHM smoothing function yields enhanced spicular activities resembling the "classical spicules" described by, e.g., Beckers (1968). Thus, a microfilament eruption might be the fundamental driver of many spicules, just as a minifilament eruption is the fundamental driver of many coronal jets. Similarly, a 0".5-FWHM smoothing renders some enhanced spicular activities to resemble previously-reported "twinned" spicules, while the full-resolution features might account for spicules sometimes appearing as 2D-sheet-like structures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.