Paper detail

Possible Periodic Dips in the Pulsating Ultraluminous X-ray Source M51 ULX-7

We report the discovery of possible periodic X-ray dips in a pulsating ultraluminous X-ray source, M51 ULX-7, with the archival Changra observations. With ~20 days of monitoring in the superorbital descending state, we discovered three dips with separations of ~2 and ~8 days via the Bayesian block technique. A phase-dispersion minimization and a $χ^2$ test suggest that the dip is likely recurrent with a period of ~2 days, consistent with the orbital period of M51 ULX-7. We interpret the dip as an obscuring of the emission from the pulsar by the vertical structure on the stream-disk interaction region or the atmosphere of the companion star. Both interpretations suggest the viewing angle to be ~60 degrees. Given that the magnetic field of M51 ULX-7 is moderately high, $B\sim10^{13}$ G, low geometric beaming with $b\lesssim1/2$ is sufficient to explain the observed flux and the presence of dips. Obscuration of the stellar wind remains an alternative possible origin and further monitoring of the dips will be required.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.