Paper detail

Possible Overionization of C II, N II, and O II Ions in the Atmospheres of Early B- and Late O-Type Stars

The reliability of C, N, and O abundances determined from the C II, N II, and O II lines in the main sequence (MS) early B- and late O-type stars is examined. This analysis is based on a fact of primary importance for this problem: the C II, N II, and O II ions in atmospheres of these stars are photoionized by radiation in the far UV. Observations show that the actual flux in this range for hot stars can be considerably higher than theoretical levels; thus, overionization of the C II, N II, and O II ions beyond the ionization calculated with the standard model atmospheres occurs in the actual atmospheres of these stars. Underestimates in the calculated ionization lead to reduced values of the C, N, and O abundances. This is confirmed by the observed dependence on the effective temperature Teff: the C, N and O abundances tend to be lower with increasing Teff. It is shown that overionization becomes significant for sufficiently hot stars, namely when Teff>18500 K for the C II lines and when Teff>26000 K for the N II and O II lines. The systematic difference in the C, N and O abundances between these relatively hot stars and the cooler B-type MS stars is about 0.2 dex. The relatively cool B-type MS stars (Teff<18100 K for C II and Teff<25000 K for N II and O II) yield the undistorted C, N and O abundances, and their average values agree very well with modern estimates for the Sun. It is noted that when an alternative method based on examining the ionization balance (e.g., He I-II, C II-III, Ne I-II, Si III-IV) is used to determine the parameters Teff and log g, the overionization problem essentially vanishes; however, this method leads to a systematic enhancement in Teff and log g. The overionization problem can be solved by shifting to the improved model atmospheres for early B- and late O-type stars that takes their sphericity into account and, possibly, stellar winds and magnetic fields.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.