Paper detail

Possible Origins of Dispersion of the Peak Energy--Brightness Correlations of Gamma-Ray Bursts

We collect and reanalyze about 200 GRB data of prompt-emission with known redshift observed until the end of 2009, and select 101 GRBs which were well observed to have good spectral parameters to determine the spectral peak energy ($E_p$), 1-second peak luminosity ($L_p$) and isotropic energy ($E_{\rm iso}$). Using our newly-constructed database with 101 GRBs, we first revise the $E_p$--$L_p$ and $E_p$--$E_{\rm iso}$ correlations. The correlation coefficients of the revised correlations are 0.889 for 99 degree of freedom for the $E_p$--$L_p$ correlation and 0.867 for 96 degree of freedom for the $E_p$--$E_{\rm iso}$ correlation. These values correspond to the chance probability of $2.18 \times 10^{-35}$ and $4.27 \times 10^{-31}$, respectively. It is a very important issue whether these tight correlations are intrinsic property of GRBs or caused by some selection effect of observations. In this paper, we examine how the truncation of the detector sensitivity affects the correlations, and we conclude they are surely intrinsic properties of GRBs. Next we investigate origins of the dispersion of the correlations by studying their brightness and redshift dependence. Here the brightness (flux or fluence) dependence would be regarded as an estimator of the bias due to the detector threshold. We find a weak fluence-dependence in the $E_p$--$E_{\rm iso}$ correlations and a redshift dependence in the $E_p$--$L_p$ correlation both with 2 $σ$ statistical level. These two effects may contribute to the dispersion of the correlations which is larger than the statistical uncertainty. We discuss a possible reason of these dependence and give a future prospect to improve the correlations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.