Paper detail

Possible Origin of Preformed Hole Pairs and Superconductivity in Cuprates

This paper addresses the long standing and controversial issue of the origin of superconductivity in cuprates. Their superconductivity can be attributed to amphoteric defects associated with vacancy sites in copper oxide planes. A local defect lattice relaxation results in a negative-$U$ energy binding two holes on amphoteric defects in the donor configuration that act as preformed boson pair. Thermodynamic equilibrium between defects in the donor and acceptor configurations stabilizes Fermi energy at the amphoteric defect charge transition state assuring resonant coupling between free holes and the localized hole pairs. Model calculations show that the critical temperature is primarily determined by the density of the amphoteric defects in the donor configuration, explaining the ubiquity of dome-like dependence of the critical temperature on the doping as well as its universal dependence on the superfluid density. Intentional doping with chemical acceptors or donors is neither necessary nor sufficient condition for superconductivity that is fully determined by the amphoteric defects whose concentration can be controlled by crystal nonstoichiometry. The only role of chemical doping is changing the balance between concentrations of amphoteric defects in the donor and acceptor configurations resulting in an increase of the superfluid density and thus also the critical temperature for acceptor and a decrease for donor doping. This accounts for the experimentally observed distinct asymmetry between the dome structures for the chemical doping with acceptors and donors. The unusual sensitivity of the critical temperature to external perturbations is explained by the resonant nature of the coupling between free holes and preformed hole pairs. The work has broader implications as it could be applicable to other superconductors with dome-like dependence of the critical temperature on doping.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.