Paper detail

Possible Formation Scenarios of ZTF J153932.16+502738.8-A Gravitational Source Close to the Peak of LISA's Sensitivity

ZTF J153932.16+502738.8 (ZTFJ1539) is an eclipsing double-white-dwarf system with an orbital period of 6.91 minutes, and is a significant source of LISA detecting gravitational wave. However, the massive white dwarf (WD) with mass of about 0.61 M$_\odot$ has a high effective temperature (48900 K), and the lower mass WD with mass of about 0.21 M$_{\odot}$ has a low effective temperature($<$10000 K). It is challenging the popular theory of binary evolution. We investigate the formation of ZTFJ1539 via nova and Algol scenarios. Assuming that the massive WD in ZTFJ1539 just experiences a thermalnuclear runaway, nova scenario can explain the effective temperatures of two WDs in ZTFJ1539. However, in order to enlarging a semi-detached orbit of about 4---5 minutes to a detached orbit of about 7 minutes, nova scenario needs a much high kick velocity of about 200 km s$^{-1}$ during nova eruption. The high kick velocity can result in high eccentricity of about 0.2---0.6. Algol scenario can also produce ZTFJ1539 if we take a high efficient parameter for ejecting common envelope and enhance the mass-loss rate via stellar wind trigger by tidal effect.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.