Paper detail

Possible existence of Ep-Lp and Ep-Eiso correlations for Short Gamma-Ray Bursts with a factor 5 to 100 dimmer than those for Long Gamma-Ray Bursts

We analyzed correlations among the rest frame spectral peak energy $E_{\rm p}$, the observed frame 64ms peak isotropic luminosity $L_{\rm p}$ and the isotropic energy $E_{\rm iso}$ for 13 Short Gamma Ray Burst (SGRB) candidates having the measured redshift $z$, $T_{\rm 90}^{\rm obs}/(1+z)<2$ sec and well determined spectral parameters. A SGRB candidate is regarded as a misguided SGRB if it is located in the 3-$σ_{\rm int}$ dispersion region from the best-fit function of the $E_{\rm p}$--$E_{\rm iso}$ correlation for Long GRBs (LGRBs) while the others are regarded as secure SGRBs possibly from compact star mergers. Using 8 secure SGRBs out of 13 SGRB candidates, we tested whether $E_{\rm p}$--$E_{\rm iso}$ and $E_{\rm p}$--$L_{\rm p}$ correlations exist for SGRBs. We found that $E_{\rm p}$--$E_{\rm iso}$ correlation for SGRBs($E_{\rm iso} =10^{51.42 \pm 0.15}{\rm erg s^{-1}} ({E_{\rm p}}/{\rm 774.5 keV})^{1.58 \pm 0.28}$) seems to exist with the correlation coefficeint $r=0.91$ and chance probability $p=1.5\times10^{-3}$. We found also that the $E_{\rm p}$--$L_{\rm p}$ correlation for SGRBs($L_{\rm p} = 10^{52.29 \pm 0.066}{\rm erg s^{-1}} ({E_{\rm p}}/{\rm 774.5 keV})^{1.59 \pm 0.11}$) is tighter than $E_{\rm p}$--$E_{\rm iso}$ correlation since $r=0.98$ and $p=1.5\times10^{-5}$. Both correlations for SGRBs are dimmer than those of LGRBs for the same $E_{\rm p}$ by factors $\sim$100 ($E_{\rm p}$--$E_{\rm iso}$) and $\sim$ 5($E_{\rm p}$--$L_{\rm p}$). Applying the tighter $E_{\rm p}$--$L_{\rm p}$ correlation for SGRBs to 71 bright BATSE SGRBs, we found that pseudo redshift $z$ ranges from 0.097 to 2.258 with the mean $<z>$ of 1.05. The redshifts of SGRBs apparently cluster at lower redshift than those of LGRBs ($<z>\sim 2.2 $), which supports the merger scenario of SGRBs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.