Paper detail

Positronium formation in graphene and graphite

Positronium (Ps) formation on the surface of clean polycrystalline copper (Cu), highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) and multi layer graphene (MLG) grown on a polycrystalline copper substrate has been investigated as a function of incident positron kinetic energy (1.5eV to 1keV). Measurments on Cu indicate that as the kinetic energy of the incident positrons increases from 1.5eV to 900eV, the fraction of positrons that form Ps ($f_{Ps}$) decreases from ~0.5 to ~0.3. However, in HOPG and MLG, instead of a monotonic decrease of $f_{Ps}$ with positron kinetic energy, a sharp peak is observed at ~ 5eV and above ~200eV,remains nearly constant in HOPG and MLG. We propose that in HOPG and MLG, at low incident positron energies the Ps formation is dominated either by a surface Plasmon assisted electron pick up process or by an energy dependent back scattering process. Both these processes can explain the peak observed and the present data can help to augment the understanding of Ps formation from layered materials.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.