Paper detail

Positive Representations of Split Real Quantum Groups: The Universal R Operator

The universal $R$ operator for the positive representations of split real quantum groups is computed, generalizing the formula of compact quantum groups $U_q(g)$ by Kirillov-Reshetikhin and Levendorski\uı-Soibelman, and the formula in the case of $U_{q\tilde{q}}(sl(2,R))$ by Faddeev, Kashaev and Bytsko-Teschner. Several new functional relations of the quantum dilogarithm are obtained, generalizing the quantum exponential relations and the pentagon relations. The quantum Weyl element and Lusztig's isomorphism in the positive setting are also studied in detail. Finally we introduce a $C^*$-algebraic version of the split real quantum group in the language of multiplier Hopf algebras, and consequently the definition of $R$ is made rigorous as the canonical element of the Drinfeld's double $\textbf{U}$ of certain multiplier Hopf algebra $\textbf{Ub}$. Moreover a ribbon structure is introduced for an extension of $\textbf{U}$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.