Paper detail

Positive Rate Binary Interactive Error Correcting Codes Resilient to $>\frac12$ Adversarial Erasures

An interactive error correcting code ($\mathsf{iECC}$) is an interactive protocol with the guarantee that the receiver can correctly determine the sender's message, even in the presence of noise. This generalizes the concept of an error correcting code ($\mathsf{ECC}$), which is a non-interactive $\mathsf{iECC}$ that is known to have erasure resilience capped at $\frac12$. The work of \cite{GuptaTZ21} constructed the first $\mathsf{iECC}$ resilient to $> \frac12$ adversarial erasures. However, their $\mathsf{iECC}$ has communication complexity quadratic in the message size. In our work, we construct the first positive rate $\mathsf{iECC}$ resilient to $> \frac12$ adversarial erasures. For any $ε> 0$, our $\mathsf{iECC}$ is resilient to $\frac6{11} - ε$ adversarial erasures and has size $O_ε(n)$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.