Paper detail

Portrait Interpretation and a Benchmark

We propose a task we name Portrait Interpretation and construct a dataset named Portrait250K for it. Current researches on portraits such as human attribute recognition and person re-identification have achieved many successes, but generally, they: 1) may lack mining the interrelationship between various tasks and the possible benefits it may bring; 2) design deep models specifically for each task, which is inefficient; 3) may be unable to cope with the needs of a unified model and comprehensive perception in actual scenes. In this paper, the proposed portrait interpretation recognizes the perception of humans from a new systematic perspective. We divide the perception of portraits into three aspects, namely Appearance, Posture, and Emotion, and design corresponding sub-tasks for each aspect. Based on the framework of multi-task learning, portrait interpretation requires a comprehensive description of static attributes and dynamic states of portraits. To invigorate research on this new task, we construct a new dataset that contains 250,000 images labeled with identity, gender, age, physique, height, expression, and posture of the whole body and arms. Our dataset is collected from 51 movies, hence covering extensive diversity. Furthermore, we focus on representation learning for portrait interpretation and propose a baseline that reflects our systematic perspective. We also propose an appropriate metric for this task. Our experimental results demonstrate that combining the tasks related to portrait interpretation can yield benefits. Code and dataset will be made public.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.