Paper detail

Population Synthesis Studies of Close Binary Systems Using a Variable Common Envelope Efficiency Parameter: I. Dependence upon Secondary Mass

We perform population synthesis calculations of present-day post common envelope binaries (PCEBs) and zero-age cataclysmic variables (ZACVs) using a common envelope efficiency parameter, alphaCE, that is a function of secondary mass, Ms. We investigate three basic possibilities: (1) a standard constant alphaCE prescription, with alphaCE = 1.0, 0.6, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1 and 0.05, to provide a baseline for comparison, (2) a power law dependence, alphaCE = (Ms)^n, with n = 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0, and (3) a dependence in which alphaCE approaches1 for large secondary masses and alphaCE = 0 below some assumed cutoff mass, alphaCE = 1 - Mcut/Ms, where Mcut is the cutoff mass and is equal to 0.0375, 0.075 and 0.15 solar mass. For each population, we compute orbital period, orbital separation, white dwarf mass and secondary mass distributions. We find that if alphaCE is less than ~0.2 in our constant alphaCE sequence, the predicted present-day ZACV population is significantly modified compared with our standard model (alphaCE = 1.0). In our variable alphaCE sequences for ZACVs, we find that for models in which alphaCE decreases very rapidly for small secondary masses, the orbital period distribution below the period gap differs significantly from our standard model. These differences are most evident in our power law sequence model with n = 2 and in our cutoff mass sequence model with Mcut = 0.15 solar mass. In these two models, the fraction of CVs forming with orbital periods below the gap is reduced significantly, the fraction forming in the gap is increased significantly, and both the short-period peak and the minimum period in the ZACV orbital period distribution shift to considerably longer orbital periods compared with our standard model.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.