Population study for gamma-ray pulsars with the outer gap model

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Abstract

Inspired by increase of population of γγ-ray emitting pulsars by the FermiFermi telescope, we perform a population study for γγ-ray emitting canonical pulsars. We use a Monte-Carlo technique to simulate the Galactic population of neutron stars and the radio pulsars. For each simulated neutron star, we consider the γγ-ray emission from the outer gap accelerator in the magnetosphere. In our outer gap model, we apply the gap closure mechanism proposed by Takata et al., in which both photon-photon pair-creation and magnetic pair-creation processes are considered. Simulating the sensitivities of previous major radio surveys, our simulation predicts that there are ∼18−23\sim 18-23 radio loud and ∼26−34\sim 26-34 γγ-ray-selected γγ-ray pulsars, which can be detected with a γγ-ray flux Fγ≥10−10 erg/cm2sF_γ\ge 10^{-10}~\mathrm{erg/cm^2 s}. Applying the sensitivity of the six-month observation of the FermiFermi telescope, 40-61 radio-selected and 36-75 γγ-ray selected pulsars are detected within our simulation. We show that the distributions of various pulsar parameters for the simulated γγ-ray pulsars can be consistent with the observed distribution of the γγ-ray pulsars detected by the FermiFermi telescope. We also predict that ∼64\sim 64 radio-loud and ∼340\sim 340 γγ-ray-selected pulsars irradiate the Earth with a flux Fγ≥10−11 erg/cm2sF_γ\ge 10^{-11}~\mathrm{erg/cm^2 s}, and most of those γγ-ray pulsars are distributing with a distance more than 1~kpc and a flux Fγ∼10−11 erg/cm2sF_γ\sim 10^{-11}~\mathrm{erg/cm^2 s}. The ration between the radio-selected and γγ-ray-selected pulsars depend on the sensitivity of the radio surveys. We also discuss the Galactic distribution of the unidentified FermiFermi sources and the canonical γγ-ray pulsars.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.