Population study for gamma-ray pulsars: (III) Radiation characteristics and viewing geometry

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Abstract

We have performed a Monte-Calro simulation for Galactic population of pulsars and for the γγ-ray observations. We apply outer gap model for the γγ-ray emission process, and study the radiation characteristics as a function of the magnetic inclination angle (α)(α) and the Earth viewing angle (ζζ). In our model, the γγ-ray flux and the spectral cut-off energy tend to decrease as the inclination and viewing angles deviate from 90∘90^{\circ}. The emerging spectrum above 100 MeV becomes soft with a photon index p∼1.8−2p\sim 1.8-2 for ζ→90∘ζ\rightarrow 90^{\circ} and p∼1.2−1.3p\sim 1.2-1.3 for ζ≪90∘ζ\ll 90^{\circ}. Our simulation predicts that the pulsars with larger inclination angles (α=70−90∘α=70-90^{\circ}) and larger viewing angles (ζ=70−90∘ζ=70-90^{\circ}) have been preferentially detected by the FermiFermi γγ-ray telescope, and hence the observed pulse profiles of the γγ-ray pulsars have the double peak structure rather than single peak. In the simulation, most γγ-ray millisecond pulsars are categorized as the radio-quiet γγ-ray pulsars, because its radio fluxes are under the sensitivities of the major radio surveys. Even we drastically increase the radio sensitivity by a factor of ten, the number of radio-selected millisecond pulsars detected by the FermiFermi ten years observations is still much less than the expected γγ-ray-selected millisecond pulsars, indicating the radio-quiet millisecond pulsars must contribute to the FermiFermi unidentified sources and/or the γγ-ray background radiations. The Unique radiation properties of the low-efficient γγ-ray pulsar, PSR J0659+1414, can be explained by the present our gap model with a viewing geometry of α∼ζ=40∘−50∘α\sim ζ=40^{\circ}-50^{\circ}.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.